The decentralized finance (DeFi) ecosystem on Ethereum has surged in popularity, with platforms like Uniswap, Aave, and Yearn enabling ERC20 token lending, staking, and trading. However, interacting with these protocols requires granting ERC20 token approvals—a critical yet potentially hazardous process if mismanaged.
Why ERC20 Approvals Are Necessary
Unlike Ethereum's native ETH (which uses payable functions), ERC20 tokens operate as smart contracts. Users cannot directly "send" these tokens to invoke functions. Instead, the ERC20 standard employs the transferFrom() function, allowing smart contracts to transfer tokens on behalf of users after obtaining approval.
Example:
When depositing DAI into Aave to earn interest:
- Approve Aave’s contract to access your DAI.
- Call Aave’s deposit function specifying the DAI amount.
- Aave uses
transferFrom()to move DAI from your wallet and credits your account with aDAI tokens.
The Dangers of Unlimited Approvals
Many DeFi platforms request unlimited approvals (authorizing access to all tokens in your wallet indefinitely). While convenient, this introduces significant risks:
- Smart Contract Vulnerabilities: Even audited projects can have bugs. A flaw could expose not just deposited funds but your entire wallet balance.
(Case Study: Sablier’s pre-launch bug threatened $10,000 in user wallets despite a $100 deposit.) - Malicious Exploits: Scams like UniCats and Degen Money exploited unlimited approvals to drain wallets, bypassing deposit limits.
Real-World Risks in 2024
Accidental Vulnerabilities:
- Bancor’s
transferFrom()function accidentally turned public, enabling unauthorized withdrawals (resolved via white-hat intervention).
- Bancor’s
Targeted Attacks:
- UniCats’ loophole allowed attackers to steal UNI tokens from wallets.
- Degen Money’s fake frontend tricked users into approving malicious addresses.
Are Hardware Wallets Safe?
While hardware wallets protect private keys, they cannot prevent ERC20 approval exploits. Attackers don’t need your key—only your approval. Always monitor and revoke unnecessary permissions.
Solutions for dApp Developers
Just-in-Time Approvals:
- Request exact amounts needed per transaction (better security, higher gas fees).
Tiered Approval Options:
- Let users choose between single-use or higher limits (adopted by 1inch and Curve).
Gas-Free Signatures (EIP-2612):
- Users sign messages instead of paying for approval transactions (limited adoption).
User Protection Strategies
- Avoid Unlimited Approvals when possible.
- Use dApp-Specific Wallets: Separate funds for untrusted platforms.
Regularly Audit Approvals:
- Tools like revoke.cash or approved.zone help track and revoke permissions.
👉 Protect your assets now by reviewing active approvals monthly.
FAQs
Q: Can I revoke an ERC20 approval?
A: Yes! Send a 0 approval transaction or use tools like revoke.cash.
Q: Do approvals expire?
A: No—they persist until manually revoked or overwritten.
Q: Are approvals needed for every transaction?
A: Only if the dApp doesn’t have unlimited access.
Conclusion
ERC20 approvals are essential but risky. With rising exploits in 2024, users must proactively manage permissions. Prioritize security over convenience—limit approvals, audit regularly, and leverage protective tools.
Author: Rosco Kalis | Adapted for clarity and SEO.
### Key SEO Keywords:
1. ERC20 approvals
2. Unlimited token risks
3. DeFi security
4. Revoke ERC20 permissions
5. Smart contract vulnerabilities
6. Hardware wallet limitations
7. Just-in-time approvals