Exemplary Ethereum Development Strategies Regarding Security and Gas-Saving

·

1. Introduction

Ethereum’s smart contract security challenges stem from multiple factors:

1.1. Research Questions

This study addresses:

  1. General Best Practices (RQ1): What foundational guidelines ensure secure Ethereum development?
  2. Attack Mitigation (RQ2): How can major attack vectors (e.g., reentrancy) be thwarted?
  3. Gas Optimization (RQ3): Which coding techniques reduce gas costs without compromising functionality?

1.2. Summary

Key outcomes:


2. Background

2.1. Gas Fees

👉 Ethereum Gas Tracker

2.2. Solidity Optimizer

Two modules:

  1. Old Optimizer: Opcode-based, merges redundant code.
  2. New Optimizer: Yul-based, optimizes cross-function calls (Solidity Docs).

2.3. Security Challenges


3. Best Practices

3.1. Security

| Practice | Description | Reference |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| Code Reuse | Use audited libraries (e.g., OpenZeppelin). | ConsenSys |
| Proxy Upgrades | Deploy upgradeable contracts for critical fixes. | OpenZeppelin |
| Check-Effect-Interact | Prevent reentrancy by updating state before external calls. | Chen et al. |

3.2. Gas Savings

Low-Cost High-Impact

Advanced Techniques


4. FAQs

Q1: How do proxy contracts improve security?

A: Proxies allow post-deployment bug fixes but introduce complexity—use selectively for long-lived contracts.

Q2: What’s the easiest gas-saving tip?

A: Enable Solidity’s optimizer (default: 200 runs) for immediate cost reduction.

Q3: Why prioritize security over gas savings?

A: Exploits (e.g., DAO hack) outweigh minor gas savings (Insight 3).

👉 Ethereum Developer Tools


5. Conclusion